in which’s Wrong to Horse Trade Over Next EU Commission President
No, the increased voter turnout because of This particular year’s elections for the European Parliament had little to do with the fact in which the major parties, like they did all 5 years ago, fielded lead candidates within the race to become the next president of the European Commission. Election researchers are in agreement about in which. Voters were worried about Europe, along with they didn’t want to allow the European Union’s fate to fall into the hands of right-wing populists. in which worked, too: The fresh right-wing grouping within the European Parliament can be significantly smaller than many had feared.
Nevertheless, EU leaders could fritter away This particular newfound, nevertheless delicate, interest within the EU if they make the decision on who will become the future head of the European Commission, the most powerful office within the EU, in back-room deals. Visibly pleased, French President Emmanuel Macron stated at the end of last Friday’s EU summit in which the process ought to be restarted. Together with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez along with others, he had made clear in which he would certainly not back Manfred Weber, the winner of the European elections, as president of the European Commission under any circumstances.
Emmanuel Macron, of all people — the picture-book European, the man who many “Pulse of Europe” enthusiasts would certainly have welcomed as German chancellor — has exposed what have long been his true colors: He, too, can be a representative of French power interests.
Rather than doing an effort to secure a majority for a future European Commission president within the European Parliament, Macron quickly shifted the decision to the leaders of the EU member states. by his point of view, This particular makes sense: within the European Parliament, his La République En Marche movement holds only 20 out of 751 total seats, along with its influence there can be negligible. At the European Council, however, the powerful EU body representing the interests of the member states, there can be no way around France’s president when in which comes to decisions on important EU posts.
Macron’s maneuvering may be prudent in terms of power politics, nevertheless he isn’t doing European democracy any favors. Under the Lisbon Treaty, EU leaders are required to take the outcome of the election for the European Parliament into account as they appoint the president of the European Commission. nevertheless right now France’s president can be trying to change the rules of the game simply because he isn’t happy with the election result.
Macron’s approach may be irrelevant in France, where the lead candidates didn’t get much attention during the campaign, nevertheless by a German point of view, in which feels like electoral fraud if the result of European elections can be no longer a factor within the appointment of the EU’s top job. The disregard for the will of the voters could not be more blatant. In Germany, after all, the Christian Democrats (CDU) along with their Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), showed rare unity in their pledge to make Weber the head of the European Commission, just as the Social Democrats (SPD) threw their support behind Dutch candidate Frans Timmermans, who represented social democrats across Europe.
Even if some of Macron’s objections to the lead candidate system cannot be dismissed out of hand, such as the point in which in which Yet again didn’t prove possible to conduct a genuine Europe-wide campaign in 2019, introducing the candidates to voters who are seeking to assume the EU’s top job can be still the right thing to do.
The introduction of lead candidates has breathed fresh life into the European election campaign — at least in Germany. Weber’s debate with Timmermans in DER NewsGerman provided a textbook lesson on how big tent parties ought to deal with the challenge posed by the populist right. along with the debates broadcast by public TV stations introduced cumbersome EU issues to an audience in which doesn’t genuinely think about them on a daily basis.
The ratings may have been ridiculously low, nevertheless following these debates, anyone interested in doing so can see where the candidates for the top Commission posts stand on important European issues, including climate change, the euro, rule of law along with the EU’s seven-year budget plan. right now, in which’s close to impossible to even guess who will emerge as the EU leaders’ compromise choice for the next European Commission president.
The way things look right right now, the social democrats along with the economic liberals within the European Parliament won’t succeed in helping Weber along with his conservatives to forge a majority within the body before the special meeting of EU leaders planned because of This particular Sunday to discuss the top post. Just what those two party groups, which include Germany’s SPD along with the business-friendly Free Democratic Party (FDP), stand to gain by allowing EU leaders to ultimately pick a conservative politician for the post behind closed doors rather than Weber, a committed member of parliament, remains their secret.
There’s one some other tiny chance for saving the idea, along with again in which would certainly hinge on a lead candidate, in This particular case Weber. The CSU politician could abandon his candidacy along with instead, together with his conservative European Peoples’ Party (EPP) group, offer his support for the post to the liberals’ lead candidate, EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, or to social democrat Frans Timmermans. Some EU leaders have criticized what they consider to be Weber’s lack of experience running a large authority or ministry, nevertheless such complaints would certainly not apply to the some other two candidates, given the Vestager along with Timmermans are already members of the Commission along with have headed ministries back in their home countries.
Of course, in which’s hard to imagine in which the EPP would certainly take in which step given in which no majority among the pro-Europeans in parliament can be possible without the conservatives’ participation.
On the some other hand, in which would certainly send a clear message to EU leaders who are right now starting their horse trading over the next European Commission president on the margins of the G-20 summit in Japan. Where, if not within the lovably chaotic European Parliament, could such an improbable about-face happen? At the same time, a parliament in which can be unable to find majorities under time pressure can be genuinely in no position to complain if EU leaders take matters into their own hands.